Power
What is Power?
Power is the ability to get someone to do something they otherwise would not do.
Power vs Authority
- Forceful
- Can be just or unjust
- Can be recognized multilaterally or not
- Could be subjective or not legitimate
Power:
- Not forceful, usually granted/earned
- Just and recognized multilaterally
- Usually defined and legitimate
Authority:
- Realist – strong military is essential for power
- Outcomes of actions are what matter most!
- “Virtu” & “Fortuna”: Leaders shape their own destiny but also depend on a little luck.
- Fear is more reliable than love… you are less likely to be betrayed if feared.
Machiavelli's Philosophy:
Political Leadership Styles

- "Do what I tell you"
- Demands compliance
- Overall negative impact on an organization
- Can work well in times of crisis or can solve problems fast
- Example: Saddam Hussein
Coercive:

- “Come with me”
- Mobilizes people toward a unified vision/goal
- Works well when direction is required
- Authoritative leaders can easily become coercive/tyrannical, when used improperly
- Example: Xi Jinping (CCP)
Authoritative:

- “People come first”
- Concentrates on harmony and building bonds
- Works with people when they face difficult situations
- May face criticism for not being “strong” enough
- Example: Jimmy Carter
Affiliative:

- “What do you think?”
- Works together to create a consensus
- Input from everyone is appreciated and valuable
- Democracy can be slow when trying to work with everybody
- Example: Barack Obama
Democratic:

- “Do it, as I do, now.”
- Sets high standards of performance
- Works effectively with motivated and competent people
- Achieves quick results
- Can dismiss others they see as “less competent”, and can be abrasive
- Example: Elon Musk
Pacesetting:

- “Try this”
- Develops people for the future - works to improve people
- Improving performance by focusing on long-term strengths
- Opposite to pacesetting, it could slow things down
- Example: Tim Walz (American Politician)
Coaching:
Types of Power
- Typically characterized as “aggressive” and “forceful”.
- Characterized by military force or economic power.
- This form of power can be used as a deterrent or a way to force what you want in global politics.
- Still in use today, but was more prevalent in earlier time periods (think of Machiavelli).
Hard Power:
- Seen as the opposite of hard power, but both could be used in unison.
- Refers to the cultural influence of a nation-state (i.e., films, books, significant people, etc.).
- Looks to influence people to act in a way you want rather than coercing/forcing them to.
- Heavily relies on a nation’s culture, international relations, scientific development, etc.
Soft Power:
- The power to influence the structure of how global politics works.
- This includes norms, ideas, rules, institutions, etc.
- Having structural power means you have the power to literally shape the rules of the game we play by (think of the constructivists).
- For example: The UN Security Council has a very strong structural power in determining how international relations go.
Structural Power:
- Looking inwards to a country’s own ability to make things happen.
- The combination of all of a country’s capacities and production to “make things happen”.
- This translates into global politics; a nation-state’s national power can determine how much it can influence other countries.
- Could involve manpower, infrastructure, ability to produce, to enforce its will, etc.
National Power:
- More recent, a combination of hard and soft power.
- Relying on soft power to influence the world, but there still exists a strong military/economic force to reinforce this influence.
- For example: Japan has a very strong cultural output on the world, while also maintaining a strong force in the Pacific Region.
- The US and China both use a combination of powers.
Smart Power:
Hegemony
- Hegemony refers to the political leadership/dominance of one state over others (e.g. The US was a global hegemon after the Cold-War)
- Can involve influencing/controlling political decisions of other states without direct governance
Political Dominance
- A hegemonic state often exerts:
- Significant economic power
- Shaping of global trade
- Finance and economic policies
- This includes control over economic institutions and currencies
Economical Influence
- Military strength is a crucial aspect of hegemony
- A hegemon maintains a powerful military presence and strategic alliance
- This ensures its ability to project power and influence globally
- Often, power is exerted by a hegemon without use of military force
Military Superiority
- Hegemony also involves the spread of cultural values, norms, and ideologies
- The hegemon’s cultural influence can shape global perceptions and behaviours
- This can make the hegemon’s ideas seem natural and universally accepted
Cultural and Ideological Leadership
-
Cultural Leadership:
- Ruling class maintains power by establishing cultural and ideological leadership
- This means they shape the norms, values, beliefs, and worldviews of society to align with their interests, making their dominance seem natural and inevitable (structural power)
-
Consent and Coercion:
- Hegemony is achieved through a combination of consent and coercion
- Ruling class using institutions (ex. schools, churches, media) to gain consent of the governed by promoting their ideology
- At the same time, they use the state and its apparatus (police, military) to enforce rules when necessary
-
Counter-Hegemony:
- Gramsci believed that the oppressed classes could challenge dominant hegemony by creating a counter-hegemony
- This involves developing an alternative set of ideas, values, and beliefs that can mobilize the masses and challenge the status quo
- Intellectuals and cultural works play a crucial role by raising awareness and organizing resistance
3 Main Points of Hegemony - Antonio Gramsci (Marxist)
- When multiple powers are competing in geopolitics with comparable strength
- Many argue we live in a multipolar world today
Multipolarity:
- When there are two competing world powers
- The best example of this was the Cold War between the USA and the USSR
Bipolarity: